Single-institutions experience with acute kidney injury in the brain injury population
Original Article

Single-institutions experience with acute kidney injury in the brain injury population

David Parizh, Vadim Meytes, Ami Patel

NYU Langone Hospital, Brooklyn, USA

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: D Parizh, V Meytes; (II) Administrative support: D Parizh, A Patel; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: D Parizh, V Meytes; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All autors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: D Parizh, V Meytes; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Vadim Meytes, D.O. NYU Langone Hospital, Brooklyn, USA. Email: vadim.meytes@gmail.com.

Background: Treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the hospital-setting focuses on prevention of the secondary insult sustained from elevated intracranial pressures. Hypertonic saline (HTS) as well as other agents are employed as part of the medical management armamentarium. A retrospective chart review was performed to analyze if more aggressive resuscitation with HTS can be tolerated by assessing the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) using the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria.

Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data from January 2012 through December 2014 was performed on 157 patients. AKIN criteria were used to assess for AKI.

Results: In total, 93.6% of patients did not meet any AKIN criteria.

Conclusions: AKI is an uncommon adverse effect of HTS use. Aggressive resuscitation with HTS may be tolerated and shorten the time to treatment by reaching therapeutic sodium levels more expeditiously.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury (AKI); traumatic brain injury (TBI); trauma, kidney


Received: 26 January 2018; Accepted: 30 March 2018; Published: 23 April 2018.

doi: 10.21037/amj.2018.04.02


Introduction

Primary brain injury refers to the unavoidable cascade of events secondary to the trauma sustained to the brain at the moment of impact. Secondary brain injury is a direct result of the physiological processes that occur following the initial trauma. The resulting sequelae leads to the activation of different pathways involving inflammation, coagulation, oxidation, and apoptosis. During what is referred to as the “golden hours” following the primary insult the physician can intervene and interrupt the progression of the disease process. This can be accomplished through interventions targeted at decreasing intracranial pressure, proper tissue oxygenation, maintenance of blood pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure (1-4).

Elevated intracranial pressures can be managed through conservative medical measures vs. operative intervention. Hypertonic saline (HTS) is a crystalloid solution with higher than physiologic concentration of sodium chloride. Animal and human studies have demonstrated that HTS can affect cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressures, and inflammatory responses in neurotrauma. HTS increases oncotic pressure intravascularly, promoting fluid shifts that as a secondary effect lead to a decreased intracranial pressures and shrinkage of brain parenchyma. Its use has been employed for conservative management of elevated intracranial pressures in conjunction with mannitol (5,6).

Despite being an effective agent in the armamentarium toward managing elevated intracranial pressures, HTS does have possible side effects: rebound intracranial hypertension, central pontine myelinolysis, renal impairment, subarachnoid hemorrhage, natriuresis, high urinary water losses, hyperchloremic acidosis, masks the development of diabetes insidious (7). Hypernatremia secondary to the use of HTS is a well-known risk factor for developing acute kidney injury (AKI) (8-10). There have been reports of renal dysfunction in the pediatric patient population with prolonged elevations of serum osmolarity. The mechanism(s) responsible is thought to be a combination of intravascular volume depletion and effects of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (10,11).

We decided to perform a retrospective analysis of all patients that sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) in order to assess the incidence of AKI using the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria (12).


Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed examining all patients that received HTS, 2% or 3%, from January 2012 through December 2014. IRB board approval was obtained for a retrospective chart review. A total of 169 patients were identified who sustained an injury that resulted in elevation of intracranial pressures. After excluding all deaths within 48 hours, and patients with baseline renal insufficiency 157 patients remained. Patients were admitted under a medical or surgical service pending their etiology. Use of 2% or 3% saline was under the discretion of the neurosurgeon and neurologist in coordination with the medical/surgical intensivist. All patients were managed per the recommended guidelines for patients with TBI. Intensive care unit admission with continuous hemodynamic monitoring, hourly neuro-checks, ventilatory support when indicated, and management of medical conditions or trauma burden was performed. Neurosurgery were consulted in all cases of intracranial hemorrhage regardless of etiology. A serum sodium between 150–159 meq was defined as therapeutic, and administration of HTS was held when sodium was greater than 160 meq or serum osmolality was greater than 320. AKIN classification was used as it relies solely on serum creatinine (Scr) levels and not glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changes. SCr levels at baseline, defined to be admission SCr, and at 48-hour interval were recorded. AKIN staging 1 through 3 was defined as per Table 1.

Table 1
Table 1 Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification and staging system of acute kidney injury (9)
Full table

Results

A total of 157 patients were assessed. Patient population and demographics are illustrated in Tables 2,3; majority of the mechanism for TBI were non-traumatic including 32.0% hemorrhagic stroke and 20.1% ischemic stroke. As illustrated in Table 4, 93.6% of patients did not sustain any form of AKI, 5 patients (3.2%) sustained stage 1 injury, 2 patients (1.3%) sustained stage 2 injury and 3 patients (1.9%) sustained stage 3 injury.

Table 2
Table 2 Patient characteristics (N=169)
Full table
Table 3
Table 3 Patient demographics (N=169)
Full table
Table 4
Table 4 Results (N=157)
Full table

Out of 157 patients that were treated with either 2% or 3% HTS, 65 people (41.4%) were at one point super-therapeutic with serum sodium measuring greater than 160 meq or serum osmolarity >320.


Discussion

Management of TBI focuses on the prevention of the secondary insult caused by increased intracranial pressure. This can be accomplished using hypertonic fluids, diuretics and surgical intervention. In a previous study, conducted by the authors in our institution, it was noted that continuous infusion of 3% HTS reached therapeutic levels, defined as serum sodium >150 meq, in 1.6 days from initiation of treatment. Our hypothesis is that more aggressive resuscitation with HTS could be tolerated without increasing the incidence of renal failure. Treatment of elevated intracranial pressure in the setting of TBI is a time sensitive issue; early aggressive treatment with HTS would be more efficacious and expeditious in reaching therapeutic serum sodium levels. However, possible side effects of HTS include: rebound in intracranial pressure, central pontine myelinolysis, renal impairment, subarachnoid hemorrhage, natriuresis, high urinary water losses, hyperchloremic acidosis, and masking of the development of diabetes insidious (7).

AKI has traditionally been classified by two major classifications, the AKIN classification and the RIFLE classification. For our study, the AKIN classification was used, as it offered several advantages. RIFLE classification is based on SCr and urine output, one major limitation of this classification is that it requires the baseline SCr, which, often in the trauma setting is not available. AKIN classification, developed in 2005, allows you to classify the stage of AKI based on two creatinine lab values obtained during a 48-hour time period. The diagnosis of AKI is only considered after achieving an adequate status of hydration and after excluding urinary obstruction; the AKIN classification only relies on SCr and not on GFR changes; baseline SCr is not necessary in the AKIN classification, and it requires at least two values of SCr obtained within a period of 48 hours (13).

In our study, 147 patients, 93.6% did not demonstrate any degree of AKI as classified by the AKIN criteria. Based on our observations the incidence of acute renal failure in the setting of HTS use is low. Thus, more aggressive use of HTS may be tolerated. Our study does carry limitations that are inherent to a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Additionally, patients who met AKIN stage 2 or 3 criteria may have sustained AKI secondary to other physiologic insults associated with shock and trauma. However, the results are strongly favoring a low incidence rate. Further studies to develop a protocol that takes into account concentrate of HTS and route of bolus vs. continuous infusion are needed to shorten the time to treatment in the TBI patient population with HTS.


Acknowledgements

None.


Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: This study was approved by Lutheran Medical Center Health System Institutional Review Board (Protocol 652).


References

  1. Saatman KE, Duhaime AC, Bullock R, et al. Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma 2008;25:719-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Lorente L. New Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Trauma Res 2015;4:e30165. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Greve MW, Zink BJ. Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. Mt Sinai J Med 2009;76:97-104. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Clayton E, Kinley-Cooper SK, Weber RA, et al. Brain stimulation: Neuromodulation as a potential treatment for motor recovery following traumatic brain injury. Brain Res 2016;1640:130-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. White H, Cook D, Venkatesh B. The use of hypertonic saline for treating intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1836-46. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Ware ML, Nemani VM, Meeker M, et al. Effects of 23.4% sodium chloride solution in reducing intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:727-36; discussion 727-36. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Qureshi AI, Suarez JI. Use of hypertonic saline solutions in treatment of cerebral edema and intracranial hypertension. Crit Care Med 2000;28:3301-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Rivkees SA. Differentiating appropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion and cerebral salt wasting: the common, uncommon, and misnamed. Curr Opin Pediatr 2008;20:448-52. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Lopes JA, Jorge S. The RIFLE and AKIN classifications for acute kidney injury: a critical and comprehensive review. Clin Kidney J 2013;6:8-14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Kumar AB, Shi Y, Shotwell MS, et al. Hypernatremia is a significant risk factor for acute kidney injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective analysis. Neurocrit Care 2015;22:184-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Gerber JG, Branch RA, Nies AS, et al. Influence of hypertonic saline on canine renal blood flow and renin release. Am J Physiol 1979;237:F441-6. [PubMed]
  12. Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 2007;11:R31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Dominguez TE, Priestley MA, Huh JW. Caution should be exercised when maintaining a serum sodium level >160 meq/L. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1438-9; author reply 1439-40. [Crossref] [PubMed]
doi: 10.21037/amj.2018.04.02
Cite this article as: Parizh D, Meytes V, Patel A. Single-institutions experience with acute kidney injury in the brain injury population. AME Med J 2018;3:59.